By Michael Skerker
The act of interrogation, and debate over its use, pervade our tradition, even if via fictionalized depictions in video clips and tv or discussions of real-life interrogations at the information. yet regardless of day-by-day mentions of the perform within the media, there's a loss of knowledgeable remark on its ethical implications. relocating past the slender specialize in torture that has characterised so much paintings at the topic, An Ethics of Interrogation is the 1st booklet to totally deal with this complicated factor. In doing so Michael Skerker confronts a number of philosophical and felony concerns, from the correct to privateness and the privilege opposed to pressured self-incrimination to prisoner rights and the criminal results of other modes of arrest, interrogation, and detention. those subject matters bring up critical questions on the morality of maintaining secrets and techniques and the diversities among nation strength at domestic and out of the country. considerate attention of those matters leads Skerker to express coverage techniques for legislations enforcement, army, and intelligence professionals.
Read Online or Download An Ethics of Interrogation PDF
Similar criminal law books
The e-book makes use of severe sociolinguistic research to ascertain the social outcomes of court docket speak. the focal point of the examine is the cross-examination of 3 Australian Aboriginal boys who have been prosecution witnesses on the subject of six law enforcement officials charged with their abduction. The research unearths how the language mechanisms allowed by means of court docket ideas of facts serve to legitimize neocolonial regulate over Indigenous humans.
In American felony legislations, if a defendant demonstrates that they lack yes mental services, they're excused of blame and punishment for wrongdoing. even if, legal safety legislation frequently fails to contemplate the developmental technology of person adjustments in skill and functioning which could tell jurisprudential problems with rational means and accountability in legal legislations.
Forensic psychological health and wellbeing evaluation (FMHA) has grown right into a specialization knowledgeable by means of learn guidance. This sequence offers up to date details at the most vital and often carried out different types of FMHA. the nineteen topical volumes handle most sensible techniques to perform for specific sorts of overview within the legal, civil, and juvenile/family parts.
- Appraising Strict Liability
- Freedom and Criminal Responsibility in American Legal Thought
- Die Anfängerklausur im Strafrecht: Zentrale Probleme des Allgemeinen Teils in der Fallbearbeitung
- Transitional Justice from Below: Grassroots Activism and the Struggle for Change (Human Rights Law in Perspective)
- Prison(er) education: stories of change and transformation
Additional resources for An Ethics of Interrogation
We begin with the assumption that all persons are autonomous, with moral rights as expressions of that autonomy, as discussed in the preceding chapter. We saw there that rights presuppose the legitimacy of coercive measures to protect those rights. Being able to fully exercise one’s rights during the full, natural course of one’s life implies two different kinds of freedom. As the terms are commonly used by philosophers, negative freedom means the absence of external impediments to one’s actions, and positive freedom means the ability to plan and lead one’s own life within the scope of one’s rights.
5 Bok’s argument connects the two commonly used definitions of privacy: the moral space in which one may reason without interference and the power to control revelations about oneself to others. It can be seen that the latter helps protect the former. 6 In Plotting, Suspicion, and the Rights to Privacy and Silence / 43 addition, certain integral human relationships are nurtured by confidences. 8 If privacy is construed as the power to control revelations about oneself, remaining silent would be a way of expressing one’s right to privacy when one is being asked for personal revelations.
In this case, Jones happens to want to protect Livingston. Coercion exercised against an offender, limited in the appropriate ways, does not violate the offender’s rights—because he never had a right to those unjust actions in the first place—so Jones may exercise proportionate coercion against Young to aid Livingston. Jones’s action may be motivated by self-interest as well. In violating Livingston’s rights, Young wrongs more than Livingston; he indirectly wrongs all other persons in the sense that Young arrogates to himself more freedom than is consistent with universal exercise.
An Ethics of Interrogation by Michael Skerker