By National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment Committee
Expanding renewable power improvement, either in the usa and in another country, has rekindled curiosity within the power for marine and hydrokinetic (MHK) assets to give a contribution to electrical energy new release. those assets derive from ocean tides, waves, and currents; temperature gradients within the ocean; and free-flowing rivers and streams. One degree of the curiosity within the attainable use of those assets for electrical energy iteration is the expanding variety of allows which were filed with the Federal strength Regulatory fee (FERC). As of December 2012, FERC had issued four licenses and eighty four initial allows, up from nearly 0 a decade in the past. even though, each one of these allows are for advancements alongside the Mississippi River, and the particular profit learned from all MHK assets is intensely small. the 1st U.S. advertisement gridconnected undertaking, a tidal venture in Maine with a means of lower than 1 megawatt (MW), is at the moment providing a fragment of that energy to the grid and is because of be totally put in in 2013.
As a part of its evaluation of MHK assets, DOE requested the nationwide learn Council (NRC) to supply precise reviews. In reaction, the NRC shaped the Committee on Marine Hydrokinetic power know-how overview. As directed in its assertion of activity (SOT), the committee first built an intervening time document, published in June 2011, which serious about the wave and tidal source exams (Appendix B). the present file comprises the committee's evaluate of all 5 of the DOE source different types in addition to the committee's reviews at the total MHK source review technique. This precis specializes in the committee's overarching findings and conclusions relating to a conceptual framework for constructing the source exams, the aggregation of effects right into a unmarried quantity, and the consistency throughout and coordination among the person source tests. evaluations of the person source overview, additional dialogue of the sensible MHK source base, and overarching conclusions and suggestions are defined in An overview of the U.S. division of Energy's Marine and Hydrokinetic source Assessment.
Read Online or Download An Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy's Marine and Hydrokinetic Resource Assessments PDF
Similar oceanography books
The authors are from the Benfield Grieg possibility study Centre and the dep.. of area and weather Physics (all college university London). The booklet has been released in 2002, and is hence seriously in response to the result of the third evaluation file of 2001 via the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on weather Change), who upgraded their temperature upward thrust forecasts to eight levels Celcius via the top of the century.
Concerning the ProductPublished by means of the yank Geophysical Union as a part of the Geophysical Monograph sequence. content material:
Oceanographers and the chilly struggle is ready patronage, politics, and the neighborhood of scientists. it's the first ebook to check the learn of the oceans through the chilly conflict period and discover the overseas concentration of yank oceanographers, taking into consideration the jobs of the U. S. military, usa international coverage, and scientists in the course of the global.
- Satellite Altimetry and Earth Sciences: A Handbook of Techniques and Applications
- Optical Oceanography
- Science Technology Synergy for Research in the Marine Environment: Challenges for the XXI Century (Developments in Marine Technology)
- Against the Tide: The Battle for America's Beaches
Extra resources for An Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy's Marine and Hydrokinetic Resource Assessments
2007). Lesser but still useful amounts of power could be obtained from turbines that are deployed in regions of strong current without greatly impeding a bay’s overall circulation. As mentioned earlier, a single turbine can extract no more than the Lanchester-Betz limit. 4 million ft3/s). Delivering such a flux would require a large number of turbines (for example, 120 turbines if each had a cross-sectional area of 100 m2, or 24 turbines of 25 m diameter if full-scale turbines were employed).
Because wave energy travels in a particular direction, care must be taken when interpreting maps that show wave power density as a function of location but do not indicate predominant wave directions. It also must be recognized that if the energy is removed by a wave energy device from the wave field at one location, less energy will necessarily be available in the shadow of the extraction device. It would not be expected that a second row of wave energy devices would perform the same as the first row of devices that the wave field encounters because the spacing between rows of typical wave extraction devices does not allow adequate fetch to replenish the resource.
Thus, developers would have to perform further fieldwork and modeling, even for planning small projects with only a few turbines. Recommendation: Follow-on work for key regions should take into account sitespecific studies and existing data from other researchers. In regions where utilityscale power may be available, further modeling should include the representation of an extensive array of turbines in order to account for changes in the tidal and current flow regime at local and regional scales.
An Evaluation of the U.S. Department of Energy's Marine and Hydrokinetic Resource Assessments by National Research Council, Division on Earth and Life Studies, Ocean Studies Board, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences, Board on Energy and Environmental Systems, Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technology Assessment Committee